Stacey :: General :: General Talk :: custom trucker hats - View Topic
Topic Rating: *****
Printable View
Marshall Eddie
New Member

Posts: 3
Status: Offline

Reputation: 0%  

custom trucker hats (22nd Jun 22 at 6:12am UTC)
The case was thrown out of court and I sued New custom embroidered hats Bern and won. However my military career was destroyed and now that I am job hunting I am positive I am being denied all because of online mugshotsSame here. I have a six year old Class D misdemeanor arrest for Failure to Appear over a speeding ticket I forgot to pay when my father very suddenly passed away. The judge was a friend of my father's, knew me, understood what was going on, and dismissed the case and I paid the ticket. Even the officer who arrested me when I was.

on the way to pick my son up from preschool got teary eyed and told me if I'd told her I had a warrant issued for my arrest she wouldn't have run my information  but, I didn't know. So, fast forward six custom hard hats and a half years after the incident and it suddenly shows up when you google my name on two different mugshot sites. Why is that newsworthy to anyone? It doesn't even have my picture/mugshot with it, nor the charges listed, just that I was arrested and released. I custom new era hats guess the folks that own the websites googled me.

Say what you want about free speech, these mugshot websites are clearly a racket and I'm not sure that a lot of their practices aren't bordering on extortion.But, in return I go after corporations like GOOGLE by blogging about their deficiencies and demonizing them based on those deficiencies. For instance, GOOGLE has a monopoly in the search engine market. If they seek to send blows to me then I throw punches back from many different angles starting with the fact that they are a monopoly. Eventually.

and the custom trucker hats amount of proof/evidence to support a lawful arrest is way lower than the amount needed to support an actual conviction. Your record may have been expunged now, but the arrest was lawful when it happened. At least that's the legal argument the newspapers use, and it's pretty tough to counter. However, I'd suggest looking into attorneys who specialize in First Amendment law free speech, defamation, and particularly publishing issues and see if they'll take your case. See if they'll do it on a contingent free basis: they don't get paid unless they win.

Whenever I search my name the first things that come up are my mugshots. I owed court costs to a courthouse out of state. I sent the payment as a money order in the mail. Somehow they did not process that the payment was payed in their computer so they issued a warrent for it. I was picked up for the warrent, and had my mugshot taken. Then was picked up and brought to the jail/courthouse where the warrent was issued. They then realised they made a mistake. They said my payment was "sitting in traffic cute bucket hats division.

If the NYT decided to run a damaging story on the front page everyday forever I am sure that there would be an argument for damages done to a public figure or political candidate. This is not a matter of freedom to publish it's a matter of publishing a story over again. There should be no loss of freedoms of the press by limiting the amount of time something can be viewed. I am sure if a new paper was to print the same story eventually it would be [img][/img] viewed as an attack because the story wouldn't be relavent.
 Printable View

All times are GMT+0 :: The current time is 8:11am
Page generated in 1.2725 seconds
Purchase Ad-Free Credits
This Forum is Powered By vForums (v2.4)
Create a Forum for Free | Find Forums